A Critical Analysis of Graham Oppy's View of Arguments about God

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

2 PhD Graduated, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Graham Oppy is an analytical philosopher in the contemporary era. He acknowledges the rationality of theistic, as well as non-theistic, beliefs, but he does not consider them successful for arguing for or against God. In general, a successful argument is one that persuades all reasonable persons who have reasonable views about the issue in question. His basic criterion for the success of an argument is its ability to convince all reasonable persons who previously denied, or were undecided about, its conclusion. The present article tries to answer the following question: Is Oppy’s standard for a satisfactory argument acceptable, and what challenges does it face? I conclude that his criterion, which renders all the traditional arguments for God’s existence unsuccessful, is pessimistic and self-defeating, because Oppy cannot provide a successful argument, by his own lights, for the correctness of his standard. He seems to propagate agnosticism, with a vague criterion, regardless of the difference between rational reason and argument from the common sense (sound judgment argument), and defending a kind of strong rationalism.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Clifford, W, 1970. “The Ethics of Belief.” In The Rationality of Belief in God, edited by George I. Mavordes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticHall.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Abu ʿAli al-Husayn. 1996. Al-nafs min kitab al-shifa. Edited by Hasanzadeh Amoli. Qom: Markas al-Nashr li-Maktab al-Iʿlam al-Islami.
Javadi Amoli, Abdullah. 1996. Tabyin barahim ithbāt wujūd khuda. Qom: Isra Publication.
Javadi Amoli, Abdallah. 2007. Manzilat ʿaql dar hindisa maʿrifat dini. Edited by Ahmad Vaezi. Qom: Isra Publications.
Malekiyan, Mustafa, 1388 Sh. “Dar justujuyi ʿaqlaniyyat wa-maʿnawiyyat.” Mehrnameh, no. 3.
Malekiyan, Mustafa, 1389 Sh. Maʿnawiyyat gawhar din, dar kitab sunnat wa secularism. Tehran: Serat.
Martin, Michael, 1990. Atheism: A philosophical Justification. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Muzaffar, Muhammad Rida. 2007. Usul fiqh. Qom: Bustan Kitab.
Muzaffar, Muhammad Rida. 2010. Al-Mantiq. Qom: Muʿassasa Islami.
Oppy, Graham. 1996. “Hume and The Argument for Biological Design.” Biology and philosophy 11, no. 4: 519-534.
Oppy, Graham. 2006. Arguing about Gods. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oppy, Graham. 2013. The Best Argument against God. Australia: Monash University.
Oppy, Graham. 2015. What Derivations Cannot Do. available at  https://Philpapers.org/rec/OPPWDC.
Oppy, Graham. 2016. Prospects for Successful Proofs of Theism or Atheism. Available at https://monash.figshare.com/.../prospect­_for_successful_proofs_of_Theism.
Peterson, Michael, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger. 1991. Reason and Religious Belief: An introduction to the philosophy of religion. New York: Oxford University press.
Planting, Alvin, 1982. “Reason and Belief in God.” In Faith and Rationality, edited by Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstroff. Notre dame: University of Notre dame Press.
Swinburne, Richard. 2004. The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tabatabaʾi, Muhammad Husayn. 2000. Nihayat al-hikma. Qom: Muʾassasa Nashr Islami.
Ter Haar, 2001. “Saint Anselm of Canterbury and Molla Sadra on the Necessity of God’s Existence.” Journal of religious thought: A Quarterly of Shiraz University, 2, no. 4 and 3, no. 1.
Tillich, Paul. 1959. Theology of Culture. Edited by Robert C. Kimball. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tusi, Nasir Al-Din. 1997. Sharh al-isharat. Qom: Balaghat Publishing.
Religious Inquiries
Volume 11, Issue 1
June 2022
Pages 73-89

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics